It looks like you're in the US. Switch to the US site
    Volobyte LogoVolobyte

    Okta vs Entra ID

    The right identity provider depends on your existing stack, not on vendor marketing. Here is what actually matters when choosing between Okta, Entra ID, and where Google Workspace fits.

    Okta · Microsoft Entra ID · Google Workspace

    7,500+

    Okta Integrations

    4-8 weeks

    Typical Rollout

    Both

    Platforms We Deploy

    P1/P2

    Entra Licence Tiers

    Quick Verdict

    If you are a Microsoft shop running E3 or E5, Entra ID is the obvious choice. You are already paying for it. If you run a diverse SaaS stack with Google Workspace, Okta's broader integration catalogue and FastPass experience are hard to beat. Google Workspace works as a basic IDP for smaller teams, but most organisations outgrow it once they need conditional access or compliance-grade governance.

    OktaBest for multi-cloud environments, diverse SaaS stacks, and organisations running Google Workspace alongside other tools.
    Entra IDBest for Microsoft-heavy environments where M365 E3/E5 licensing already covers the cost.

    Side-by-Side Comparison

    FeatureOktaMicrosoft Entra ID
    SSO (SAML/OIDC)
    MFAOkta Verify, FastPass, FIDO2, OTPAuthenticator, FIDO2, passkeys, SMS, certificate-based
    Passwordless authOkta FastPass (device-bound)Windows Hello, passkeys, certificate-based, Authenticator phone sign-in
    SCIM provisioning7,500+ pre-built integrationsNative for M365, growing third-party catalogue
    Conditional accessOkta Policies + device trustConditional Access (deeply integrated with M365)
    Directory servicesUniversal DirectoryMicrosoft Entra ID
    Microsoft 365 integrationWorks but requires federationNative, seamless
    Non-Microsoft app supportExcellent, 7,500+ pre-built integrationsGood but fewer pre-built connectors
    Google Workspace integrationFull SSO + SCIM, works as upstream IDPFederation supported, not native
    Platform SSO (macOS)Supported via Okta Device TrustSupported (Entra joined Mac)
    Device trust / endpoint integrationJamf, IRU (Kandji), CrowdStrike, SentinelOneIntune, Defender (native); third-party via compliance partners
    Identity threat detectionOkta ThreatInsight (included)Identity Protection (P2 licence)
    Lifecycle automation (JML)Okta Workflows (visual, no-code)Lifecycle Workflows (GA)
    Governance (IGA)Okta Identity Governance (add-on)Entra ID Governance (requires P2 or standalone licence)
    Pricing modelPer user/month, feature-based tiersBundled with M365 E3/E5, or standalone P1/P2
    Best forMulti-cloud, best-of-breed stacksMicrosoft-heavy environments

    Not sure which identity provider fits your stack?

    Our free IT audit covers identity, access management, and licensing.

    Take the free audit →

    When to choose Okta

    Broad integration catalogue

    7,500+ pre-built SSO and SCIM connectors. If you run Slack, Notion, Figma, AWS, and dozens of other SaaS tools, Okta saves weeks of custom configuration.

    FastPass passwordless

    Device-bound biometrics eliminate MFA prompts entirely. Users never pull out their phone. Works across Mac, Windows, and mobile today.

    Multi-cloud environments

    Okta is cloud-agnostic. If your infrastructure spans AWS, GCP, and Azure, Okta provides consistent identity without vendor lock-in.

    Google Workspace stacks

    Full SSO and SCIM support for Google Workspace as an upstream IDP. If Google is your primary productivity suite, Okta layers on top cleanly.

    When to choose Entra ID

    Microsoft 365 investment

    If you already pay for E3 or E5, Entra ID P1 or P2 is included. Adding Okta means paying twice for identity unless you have a compelling reason.

    Intune and Defender integration

    Conditional access policies are deeply integrated with Intune device compliance and Microsoft Defender. If your endpoint stack is Microsoft, Entra ties it all together natively.

    Bundled licensing

    P1 comes with E3, P2 comes with E5. Governance, PIM, and identity protection are included at the right licence tier. No add-on purchases required.

    Windows-first environments

    Windows Hello, platform SSO for Mac, and native device join. If your fleet is primarily Windows with some Mac, Entra handles both without a third-party IDP.

    What About Google Workspace?

    Google Workspace includes a basic identity layer that works well for smaller teams. It handles SSO for Google apps and a limited set of third-party SAML integrations. For teams under 50 people running mostly Google-native tools, it can be enough on its own.

    The limitations show up at scale. Google Workspace does not offer conditional access policies, SCIM provisioning to most non-Google apps, or compliance-grade governance features like access reviews or privileged identity management. Once you need any of these, you layer Okta or Entra ID on top.

    In practice, we see two common patterns. Companies running Google Workspace with a diverse SaaS stack typically add Okta for its broad integration catalogue and FastPass experience. Companies that have migrated to Microsoft 365 or run a hybrid environment typically consolidate on Entra ID because the licensing is already included.

    What We Actually See in Practice

    The biggest factor is your existing Microsoft investment. Companies on E3 or E5 already have Entra ID P1 or P2 included. Adding Okta on top means paying twice for identity. Unless you have a specific reason, such as 50+ non-Microsoft apps that need SSO, Entra ID is the pragmatic choice for Microsoft-heavy environments.

    That said, Okta's integration catalogue is genuinely superior. If you run Slack, Notion, Figma, AWS, and a dozen other best-of-breed tools, Okta's pre-built SCIM connectors save weeks of custom configuration. Entra ID is catching up but still has gaps with non-Microsoft apps, particularly around automated provisioning and deprovisioning.

    Okta FastPass remains a standout feature. It eliminates MFA prompts entirely by using device-bound biometrics. Users never pull out their phone. Microsoft is moving toward similar passwordless flows with Windows Hello and Authenticator phone sign-in, but FastPass works consistently across Mac, Windows, and mobile today.

    For conditional access, both platforms are strong. Entra ID's conditional access policies are deeply integrated with Microsoft Defender and Intune. Okta's device trust works well with Jamf, Kandji, CrowdStrike, and SentinelOne. Choose based on your endpoint stack. If you run Intune and Defender, Entra is the natural fit. If you run Jamf or Kandji with CrowdStrike, Okta ties into those tools more cleanly.

    We also see growing demand for lifecycle automation. Okta Workflows provides a visual, no-code builder for joiners, movers, and leavers processes. Entra Lifecycle Workflows is now generally available and covers similar ground, though it is more tightly scoped to the Microsoft ecosystem. For organisations with complex JML requirements spanning multiple platforms, Okta Workflows currently offers more flexibility.

    Okta vs Entra ID FAQs

    Is Okta better than Entra ID?

    Neither is objectively better. Okta excels when you use a diverse set of SaaS tools and need broad SSO coverage. Entra ID wins when your stack is heavily Microsoft and you already pay for E3 or E5 licences. Volobyte deploys both and recommends based on fit, not margin.

    Can I use both Okta and Entra ID together?

    Yes. Some organisations federate Entra ID to Okta, using Okta as the primary identity provider while keeping Entra ID for Microsoft 365 integration. This gives you the best of both worlds but adds complexity. We set this up regularly.

    Is Entra ID free with Microsoft 365?

    A basic version is included. But the features that matter for security and compliance, such as conditional access, PIM, and governance, require P1 or P2 licences. These are included in E3 and E5 bundles or sold separately.

    Which is easier to implement?

    Entra ID is simpler if you are already on Microsoft 365, because the directory already exists. Okta is straightforward to deploy from scratch and has excellent documentation. Both take 4-8 weeks for a proper rollout with conditional access and provisioning configured correctly.

    Does Volobyte recommend one over the other?

    We deploy both regularly. For companies running Google Workspace or diverse SaaS stacks, Okta is usually the better fit. For Microsoft-heavy environments, Entra ID makes more sense because you are already paying for it. We also help organisations running Google Workspace layer Okta or Entra on top for enterprise-grade controls.

    Where does Google Workspace fit?

    Google Workspace works as a basic identity provider for smaller teams. It handles SSO for Google apps and a limited set of third-party integrations. For conditional access, SCIM provisioning to most non-Google apps, or compliance-grade governance, you layer Okta or Entra ID on top. Volobyte helps teams make this transition when they outgrow Google as their primary IDP.

    Can I migrate from one to the other?

    Yes. Federation allows running both platforms in parallel during migration, so users are not disrupted. Volobyte handles these migrations regularly. The typical timeline is 4-8 weeks depending on the number of connected applications and provisioning rules.

    Not sure which identity provider fits?

    We implement both Okta and Entra ID. Tell us about your stack and we will give you a straight answer, no sales pitch.

    Cookie Preferences

    This site uses cookies for bookings and core features. Optional cookies help us improve your experience.

    Privacy Policy